Thursday, January 7, 2010

Ignore The Investment/Media Conspiracy

The New Year always brings predictions of what is to come. In the financial industry, regardless of the time of year, there are plenty of ‘experts’ willing to provide the media with opinions on the future direction of markets.

It is not often appreciated by investors, but there is a cozy relationship between the media and the traditional investing industry. In short, they both want you to believe that certain individuals have uncanny powers of foresight.

For stock and bond analysts, promoting this illusion of insight is helpful, because it justifies their fees and keeps people trading. For the media, the myth that certain remarkable individuals can reliably forecast market prices is helpful, because it provides endless "gee whiz" stories for the readers/viewers who keep the advertising revenue flowing.

The fact is, no matter how smart individual analysts may be, and no matter how much they know about the companies and sectors they follow, in the end they are hostage to unforeseen events. These might include changes in federal laws and regulations, or the discovery of a new technology that renders a previously innovative solution obsolete, or even a breakdown in an obscure area of the mortgage market that unleashes a global meltdown in the banking industry. (Sound familiar?)

The bad news is no one knows what the investment future will hold. The good news is you don't need to know in order to have a successful investment experience. You simply have to rely on a few fundamental principles:

It is impossible to identify superior investment managers in advance.
Capitalism breeds competition, and that makes markets difficult to beat. With millions of participants competing in capital markets, it is hard to identify in advance anyone who can systematically beat the market. Eliminate the risk of choosing the wrong manager by following a low cost, broadly diversified approach that does not rely on stock/bond picking or market timing.

Diversification is the only antidote for uncertainty.
Although diversification neither assures a profit nor guarantees against loss, a properly constructed and well-diversified portfolio is a key component of a successful investment experience. Portfolios should be designed to capture certain risks and eliminate others, depending on your preference and capacity for various types of risk.

There is no free lunch. Risk and return are related.
Much like a football player who chooses to play without a helmet, you should not expect to be paid more for taking risks that can easily be avoided. Higher expected returns only come from bearing more risk that cannot be diversified away. Focus on eliminating risks that you should not expect a reward for taking, such as concentrating your portfolio in just a few stocks.

Don't guess. Invest.
Rather than relying on speculation, blind faith, or anecdotal evidence, concentrate on what can be controlled: Managing the transactional costs of investing, reducing the impact of taxes, and taking a long-term view. Design portfolios that are cost effective, tax efficient, and disciplined.

Good investment management is not about media hype or making forecasts. Good investment management is about understanding and managing risk around an overall financial plan.

5 comments:

  1. Bill how do you advocate managing risk? If risk can't be foreseen, how do you manage that which you don't know?

    Bratz

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jeff, I don't say investment risk can't be foreseen. We know there will be risk, which is managed through proper asset allocation. What I say is the future can't be foreseen, and therefore any attempt to actively manage it through market timing and/or security selection and/or investment 'products' is both futile and expensive to the investor.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ok. I agree 100%, but what I think is being neglected here is that diversification is broadly used, yet poorly defined. More specifically, I believe that we are seeing more and more correlation of global equity(and debt markets). Those that espouse 'diversity' rarely build diversified portfolios, and I often wonder if most in our industry understand diversification.

    One other thing that I really struggle with in the 'diversity' story is: why are we needed? If, as you advocate, no-load, non-manaaged/indexed funds how do we as helpers help those that are being helped?

    I would even question why buy funds and not go to ETF's? An investor could be much more risk managment driven with ETF's versus funds.

    Simply asking questions-

    bratz

    ReplyDelete
  4. People still need information 'helpers' to explain what good things index funds and ETFs are, and also with understanding things like risk and asset allocation. They just don't need fund analyst and economist and commission sales-based 'helpers' sucking out value and giving nothing in return. This is the message of Warren Buffett's 'helper' parable in the Berkshire Hathaway annual report from a couple of years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  5. the helpers hurdle of cost is a promise of under performing the markets.

    ReplyDelete